Skip to content

Research Project for Eager Beavers

February 24, 2009

Why is the speed of light considered a constant (never changing)?

5 Comments leave one →
  1. Mac permalink
    February 25, 2009 10:11 am

    Honestly, that’s a good question…Maybe because it…is???

  2. Rob permalink
    February 25, 2009 8:07 pm

    Nope, try again

  3. Rob permalink
    February 26, 2009 6:13 pm

    Okay, nobody wants to play.The speed of light is considered a constant… by definition. Not by empirical evidence, not by repeatable testing, but because some guy said so (seriously, check out Wikipedia).Why is this a big deal? Because if it isn’t a constant then radiometric dating, for example, is useless (that’s not when radioactive people smooze, it’s how object’s age are determined). Anything measurements depending on atomic processes are null and void. Like the age of bones, fossils, rocks, ANYTHING.That’s a lot of science depending on a definition…

  4. Anonymous permalink
    February 27, 2009 12:12 am

    Oh Rob, it’s not that I don’t want to play… it is just soooo beyond my comprehension. 😦 (As many of your topics are). One of these days there will be a topic I can participate in. :)jcd

  5. Anonymous permalink
    February 27, 2009 4:34 pm

    That one is way too deep for me. It requires thinking, and on a normal day, I don’t do too much of that. But for the last several days…:-)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: